EAC to host virtual roundtable on 2020 election accessibility study and accessibility lessons learned
MEDIA ADVISORY
February 16, 2021
MEDIA ADVISORY
February 16, 2021
Federal: EVS 5200, EVS 5203, EVS 5210, EVS 5220, EVS 5240, EVS 6000, EVS 6020, EVS 6030, EVS 6040, EVS 6043
State: EVS 5241, EVS 5320, EVS 5340, EVS 5341, EVS 6040 AZ, EVS 6050, FL EVS 4520 v1r2, FL EVS 4530 v1r2, FL EVS 4530 v2r3
During the ExpressVote verification process, when the Firmware Hash File does not match
the Trusted Hash File, a difference report is generated.
The name of the difference report fits the form ExpressVote- Identification_Report.txt,
where “ExpressVote- Identification” is the unique identifier that was supplied when
VerifyHash.sh was executed.
ES&S Voting System 6.2.0.0 (EVS6200) presents a fully integrated suite of election management products that fully comply with the EAC Voluntary Voting System Guidelines, Version 1.0. This release introduces the DS950®, a high-speed central count scanner and tabulator with ballot sorting capabilities.
EVS6200 also introduces additional options for transmission of unofficial results data over closed networks. In addition to clients reading results media and the central tabulators transferring data across a closed network, the Regional Results application will provide the ability to read results media from the DS200, ExpressTouch, and ExpressVote XL and transmit the results collection files over a customer dedicated network via the Regional Results software for more efficient results reporting.
For Immediate Release
February 10, 2021
Virtual via Zoom.
For Immediate Release
January 25, 2021
Virtual via Zoom.
No. When an expense to the grant can also be allocated to non HAVA funding, allocation methodology should follow 2CRF § 200.405. Examples: Equipment that benefits both federal and non-federal elections or election office salaries where time is allocated to federal and non-federal activities. The EAC can help you make the determination to allocate funds appropriately, which should occur at the time of procurement.
---
There is no one way to allocate costs and allocation methods will vary across states. There are two scenarios in which states may need to allocate costs between the benefits to the HAVA grant and other state office activities; (1) when purchasing equipment or claiming costs such as salaries under the grant during the grant period and, (2) when you purchase equipment you will use after the grant ends. Allocation is done at the point of purchase. EAC can help you make the determination during the grant to allocate the funds appropriately when you purchase the items. As examples, if you buy equipment solely in response to the pandemic and use it during the 2020 election, you can allocate the total cost to the CARES grant because it is a reasonable and necessary cost to respond to the pandemic. If you buy laptops for your staff and they will perform duties outside of the grant during the grant period, you need to allocate the costs appropriately. Grantees typically allocate percentages of time spent on grant and non-grant activities.