Skip to main content

ESS-1100

Tuesday, December 23, 2025
Testing Lab
Impacted Device/System

Federal: EVS 5200, EVS 5203, EVS 5210, EVS 5220, EVS 5240, EVS 6000, EVS 6020, EVS 6030, EVS 6040, EVS 6043

State: EVS 5241, EVS 5320, EVS 5340, EVS 5341, EVS 6040 AZ, EVS 6050, FL EVS 4520 v1r2, FL EVS 4530 v1r2, FL EVS 4530 v2r3

Date Approved by EAC
10/14/2020
Short Description of Changes

During the ExpressVote verification process, when the Firmware Hash File does not match

the Trusted Hash File, a difference report is generated.

The name of the difference report fits the form ExpressVote- Identification_Report.txt,

where “ExpressVote- Identification” is the unique identifier that was supplied when

VerifyHash.sh was executed.

Additional Documentation

EVS 6.2.0.0

Tuesday, December 23, 2025
Body

ES&S Voting System 6.2.0.0 (EVS6200) presents a fully integrated suite of election management products that fully comply with the EAC Voluntary Voting System Guidelines, Version 1.0. This release introduces the DS950®, a high-speed central count scanner and tabulator with ballot sorting capabilities.

EVS6200 also introduces additional options for transmission of unofficial results data over closed networks. In addition to clients reading results media and the central tabulators transferring data across a closed network, the Regional Results application will provide the ability to read results media from the DS200, ExpressTouch, and ExpressVote XL and transmit the results collection files over a customer dedicated network via the Regional Results software for more efficient results reporting.

Testing standard
Testing Lab
Certification Date
12/23/2021
Certification Status
Certified System
Testing Application Date
01/29/2021
Testing Status
Certified
Application Accepted Date
02/12/2021
Test Report Media
Advisory Notice Media
Product
Version
6.2.0.0

ClearVote 2.2

Wednesday, June 12, 2024
Testing standard
Testing Lab
Certification Date
12/23/2021
Certification Status
Certified System
Testing Application Date
01/04/2021
Testing Status
System Certified
Application Accepted Date
01/20/2021
Testing Documents Media
Certification Media
Product
Version
2.2

No. When an expense to the grant can also be allocated to non HAVA funding, allocation methodology should follow 2CRF § 200.405. Examples: Equipment that benefits both federal and non-federal elections or election office salaries where time is allocated to federal and non-federal activities. The EAC can help you make the determination to allocate funds appropriately, which should occur at the time of procurement.

---

There is no one way to allocate costs and allocation methods will vary across states.  There are two scenarios in which states may need to allocate costs between the benefits to the HAVA grant and other state office activities;  (1) when purchasing equipment or claiming costs such as salaries under the grant during the grant period and, (2) when you purchase equipment you will use after the grant ends.  Allocation is done at the point of purchase.  EAC can help you make the determination during the grant to allocate the funds appropriately when you purchase the items.  As examples, if you buy equipment solely in response to the pandemic and use it during the 2020 election, you can allocate the total cost to the CARES grant because it is a reasonable and necessary cost to respond to the pandemic.  If you buy laptops for your staff and they will perform duties outside of the grant during the grant period, you need to allocate the costs appropriately.  Grantees typically allocate percentages of time spent on grant and non-grant activities.   

Subscribe to